AP®︎ U.S. Government & Politics: Unit 1 Practice Test

Review: EK 1.1.A.1

The U.S. government is based on the following democratic ideals: i. Natural rights (all people have certain rights that cannot be taken away) ii. A social contract (an implicit agreement among the people in a society to give up some freedoms to maintain social order) iii. Popular sovereignty (all government power comes from the consent of its people) iv. Limited government (a government's power cannot be absolute)

Review: EK 1.1.A.2

The ideal of limited government is ensured by the interaction of these principles: i. Separation of powers ii. Checks and balances iii. Federalism iv. Republicanism

Review: EK 1.1.A.3

The Declaration of Independence, drafted by Thomas Jefferson (with help from Adams and Franklin), restates the philosophy of natural rights, and provides a foundation for popular sovereignty. The U.S. Constitution, drafted by James Madison at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia that was led by George Washington (with important contributions from Hamilton and members of the "Grand Committee"), is an example of a social contract and establishes a system of limited government. The Constitution provides the blueprint for a unique form of democratic government in the United States. The Gettysburg Address, written by Abraham Lincoln and delivered during the U.S. Civil War, reaffirmed equality and popular sovereignty as defining foundations of democracy.

Review: EK 1.2.A.1

Representative democracies can take several forms including the following models: i. Participatory democracy, which emphasizes broad participation in politics and civil society ii. Pluralist democracy, which emphasizes group-based activism by nongovernmental interests striving for impact on political decision making iii. Elite democracy, which emphasizes limited participation in politics and civil society

Review: EK 1.2.A.2

Different aspects of the U.S. Constitution as well as the debate between Federalist No. 10 and Brutus No. 1 reflect the tension between the broad participatory model and the more filtered participation of the pluralist and elite models of representative democracy.

Review: EK 1.2.A.3

The three models of representative democracy continue to be reflected in contemporary institutions and political behavior.

Review: EK 1.3.A.1

Federalists supported ratification of the Constitution and a strong central government. Madison’s arguments in Federalist No. 10 focused on the superiority of a large republic in controlling the “mischiefs of faction,” delegating authority to elected representatives and dispersing power between the states and national government.

Review: EK 1.3.A.2

Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the Constitution and wanted more power reserved to state governments rather than a strong central government. Anti-Federalist writings, including Brutus No. 1, adhered to popular democratic theory that emphasized the benefits of a small, decentralized republic while warning of the dangers to personal liberty from a large, centralized government.

Review: EK 1.4.A.1

Specific incidents and legal challenges that highlighted key weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation are represented by the: i. Lack of centralized military power to address Shays’ Rebellion ii. Lack of an executive branch to enforce laws, including taxation iii. Lack of a national court system iv. Lack of power to regulate interstate commerce v. Lack of the exclusive power to coin money

Review: EK 1.5.A.1

Compromises deemed necessary for ratification of the Constitution included the following: i. Great (Connecticut) Compromise, which created a dual (bicameral) system of congressional representation with the House of Representatives based on each state’s population and the Senate representing each state equally ii. Electoral College, which created a system for electing the president by electors from each state rather than by popular vote or by congressional vote iii. Three-Fifths Compromise, which provided a formula for calculating a state’s enslaved population for purposes of representation in the House and for taxation iv. Postponing until 1808 a decision whether to ban the importation of enslaved persons v. Agreement to add a Bill of Rights to address concerns of the Anti-Federalists

Review: EK 1.5.A.2

Debates about self-government during the drafting of the Constitution necessitated the drafting of an amendment process in Article V that entailed either a two-thirds vote in both houses or a proposal from two-thirds of the state legislatures, with final ratification determined by three-fourths of the states.

Review: EK 1.5.A.3

The compromises necessary to secure ratification of the Constitution left some matters unresolved that continue to generate discussion and debate today.

Review: EK 1.5.A.4

The debate over the role of the national government, the powers of state governments, and the rights of individuals remains at the heart of present-day constitutional issues about democracy and governmental power, as represented by: i. Debates about government surveillance resulting from the federal government’s response to the 9/11 attacks ii. Debates about the role of government in public school education

Review: EK 1.6.A.1

The specific and separate powers delegated to Congress, the president, and the courts allow each branch to check and balance the power of the other branches, ensuring no one branch becomes too powerful.

Review: EK 1.6.A.2

Federalist No. 51 explains how constitutional provisions of separation of powers and checks and balances control potential abuses by majorities.

Review: EK 1.6.B.1

Separation of powers and checks and balances creates multiple access points for stakeholders and institutions to influence public policy.

Review: EK 1.6.B.2

Checks and balances and separation of powers allow legal actions to be taken against public officials deemed to have abused their power. Those legal actions include the process of impeachment (the House formally charges an official with abuse of power or misconduct) and removal (if the official is convicted in a Senate impeachment trial).

Review: EK 1.7.A.1

Federalism is the system of government in the United States in which power is shared between the national and state governments. The exclusive and concurrent powers of the national and state governments help explain the ongoing debate over the balance of power between the two levels. Federalist No. 39 explains that this division of authority combines national and state features to limit the concentration of power in any one part of the government while also allowing multiple access points for political participation.

Review: EK 1.7.A.2

Exclusive power is held by only one level of government and includes enumerated powers that are written in the Constitution, and implied powers that are not specifically written in the Constitution but are inferred from the Necessary and Proper Clause.

Review: EK 1.7.A.3

Reserved powers are those not delegated or enumerated to the national government but are reserved to the states, as stated in the Tenth Amendment.

Review: EK 1.7.A.4

Concurrent powers are shared between both levels of government such as the power to collect taxes, the power to make and enforce laws and the power to build roads.

Review: EK 1.7.A.5

i. Revenue sharing (national funding with almost no restrictions to the states on its use and is the least used form of funding)

Review: EK 1.8.A.1

The Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment give the national government the power to enforce protections for any person against the states, but Supreme Court interpretations can influence the extent of those protections.

Review: EK 1.8.A.2

The Commerce Clause gives the national government the power to regulate interstate commerce, but Supreme Court interpretations can influence the extent of this power.

Review: EK 1.8.A.3

The Necessary and Proper Clause gives Congress the power to make laws related to carrying out its enumerated powers, but Supreme Court interpretations can influence the extent of these powers.

Review: EK 1.8.A.4

The Supremacy Clause gives the national government and its laws general precedence over states’ laws, but Supreme Court interpretations may affect when specific actions exceed this constitutional power.

Review: EK 1.9.A.1

The allocation of powers between national and state governments creates multiple access points for stakeholders and institutions to influence public policy.

Review: EK 1.9.A.2

National policymaking is constrained by the sharing of concurrent powers with state governments.