AP®︎ U.S. Government & Politics: Topic 3.13 Flashcards

Master key terms and definitions for Topic 3.13 of AP U.S. Government & Politics – Affirmative Action to help you prep for quizzes and the AP exam.


0%
13 cards total
13 not started
0 learning
0 almost done
0 mastered
Term

Affirmative Action

Definition

Policies that deliberately seek to reduce education or employment disparities associated with race, ethnicity, gender, disability, or age, rather than merely prohibiting discrimination

1 / 13
Affirmative Action
Not Started

Policies that deliberately seek to reduce education or employment disparities associated with race, ethnicity, gender, disability, or age, rather than merely prohibiting discrimination

LO 3.13.AEK 3.13.A.1
Colorblind Interpretation vs. Race-Conscious Remedial Interpretation
Not Started

The colorblind view says government must never classify individuals by race; the remedial view says limited race-conscious action may be needed to correct proven discrimination and make equality meaningful

LO 3.13.AEK 3.13.A.1
Strict Scrutiny
Not Started

The most demanding constitutional review, requiring a racial classification to serve a compelling governmental interest and be narrowly tailored to that interest

LO 3.13.AEK 3.13.A.1
Racial Quota
Not Started

A policy reserving a fixed number or proportion of opportunities by race; the Court treats explicit racial quotas as especially difficult to reconcile with equal protection

LO 3.13.AEK 3.13.A.1
Individualized Consideration (Holistic Review)
Not Started

Evaluating each applicant's complete record instead of assigning an automatic racial benefit; personal experiences involving race may be considered, but race itself may not supply an admissions advantage

LO 3.13.AEK 3.13.A.1
Milliken v. Bradley (1974)
Not Started

Held that a school-desegregation remedy could not cross district lines without proof of an interdistrict violation; the remedy must match the proven constitutional violation

LO 3.13.AEK 3.13.A.1
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (2007)
Not Started

Struck down public-school assignment plans that classified individual students by race, while leaving room for integration methods that did not mechanically classify individual students by race

LO 3.13.AEK 3.13.A.1
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)
Not Started

Invalidated a medical school's fixed racial set-aside but allowed, at the time, limited consideration of race as one factor in individualized admissions

LO 3.13.AEK 3.13.A.1
Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)
Not Started

Upheld a law school's individualized use of race because student-body diversity was accepted as a compelling interest and the policy was narrowly tailored

LO 3.13.AEK 3.13.A.1
Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)
Not Started

Invalidated an undergraduate policy that automatically awarded underrepresented minority applicants 20 points because it lacked individualized consideration

LO 3.13.AEK 3.13.A.1
Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina (2023)
Not Started

Held both race-conscious admissions programs unlawful; race itself may not provide an admissions advantage, though an applicant’s race-related experiences may be considered for what they show about character or accomplishments

LO 3.13.AEK 3.13.A.1
Compelling Governmental Interest
Not Started

An objective important enough to justify a racial classification, such as remedying an institution’s own identified past discrimination

LO 3.13.AEK 3.13.A.1
Narrow Tailoring
Not Started

A close fit between a policy and its compelling interest, including consideration of race-neutral alternatives and limits on automatic, excessive, or indefinite use of race

LO 3.13.AEK 3.13.A.1