AP®︎ U.S. Government & Politics: Topic 3.3 Flashcards

Master key terms and definitions for Topic 3.3 of AP U.S. Government & Politics – First Amendment: Freedom of Speech to help you prep for quizzes and the AP exam.


0%
23 cards total
23 not started
0 learning
0 almost done
0 mastered
Term

Freedom of Speech

Definition

First Amendment protection against government suppression of expression, especially political expression, subject to limited, defined restrictions

1 / 23
Freedom of Speech
Not Started

First Amendment protection against government suppression of expression, especially political expression, subject to limited, defined restrictions

LO 3.3.AEK 3.3.A.1
Symbolic Speech
Not Started

Nonverbal conduct intended to communicate an idea or belief, such as wearing an armband or burning a flag in protest

LO 3.3.AEK 3.3.A.1
Compelled Expression
Not Started

Government coercion requiring a person to affirm or communicate an official message, generally prohibited by the First Amendment

LO 3.3.AEK 3.3.A.1
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943)
Not Started

The Supreme Court held that public schools cannot compel students to salute the flag or recite the Pledge of Allegiance

LO 3.3.AEK 3.3.A.1
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969)
Not Started

The Supreme Court protected students' antiwar armbands as symbolic speech because they did not materially and substantially disrupt school

LO 3.3.AEK 3.3.A.1
Substantial-Disruption Standard
Not Started

Public schools may restrict student expression when officials can reasonably forecast material and substantial disruption or interference with others' rights

LO 3.3.AEK 3.3.A.2
Morse v. Frederick (2007)
Not Started

The Supreme Court held that a public school may restrict student expression reasonably understood as encouraging illegal drug use

LO 3.3.AEK 3.3.A.2
Content-Based Restriction
Not Started

A speech restriction that depends on the subject or message being communicated and is generally presumptively unconstitutional

LO 3.3.AEK 3.3.A.1
Viewpoint Discrimination
Not Started

Government restriction that permits discussion of a subject but favors or suppresses a particular side of the debate

LO 3.3.AEK 3.3.A.1
Time, Place, and Manner Regulations
Not Started

Content-neutral limits on when, where, or how expression occurs; in a traditional public forum, they generally must be narrowly tailored to a significant government interest and leave ample alternative channels

LO 3.3.AEK 3.3.A.2
Traditional Public Forum
Not Started

Government property historically open to public expression, such as streets, sidewalks, and parks, where speech receives strong protection

LO 3.3.AEK 3.3.A.2
Schenck v. United States (1919)
Not Started

The Supreme Court upheld Schenck's wartime conviction for anti-draft leaflets, ruling that speech creating a clear and present danger could be restricted

LO 3.3.AEK 3.3.A.2
Clear and Present Danger Test
Not Started

Schenck's historical standard asking whether speech in its circumstances creates a clear and present danger of harms government may prevent

LO 3.3.AEK 3.3.A.2
Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) / Imminent Lawless Action Test
Not Started

Government may punish advocacy of unlawful conduct only when it is directed to producing imminent lawless action and is likely to produce it

LO 3.3.AEK 3.3.A.2
True Threat
Not Started

A serious communication of intent to commit unlawful violence against a person or group, rather than joking, exaggeration, or abstract advocacy

LO 3.3.AEK 3.3.A.2
Fighting Words
Not Started

Personally abusive face-to-face words likely to provoke an immediate violent reaction, a narrowly interpreted category subject to regulation

LO 3.3.AEK 3.3.A.2
Defamation
Not Started

A false statement of fact communicated about another person that harms that person's reputation

LO 3.3.AEK 3.3.A.2
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964)
Not Started

The Supreme Court required public officials suing over statements about public affairs to prove actual malice

LO 3.3.AEK 3.3.A.2
Actual Malice
Not Started

Knowledge that a defamatory statement was false or reckless disregard for whether it was true, not ordinary hostility or ill will

LO 3.3.AEK 3.3.A.2
Obscenity
Not Started

A narrow category of sexually explicit expression that satisfies the Miller test and receives no First Amendment protection

LO 3.3.AEK 3.3.A.2
Miller Test
Not Started

Material is obscene if, under contemporary community standards, it appeals to a prurient interest; depicts legally defined sexual conduct in a patently offensive way; and, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value

LO 3.3.AEK 3.3.A.2
Libel
Not Started

Written defamation

LO 3.3.AEK 3.3.A.2
Slander
Not Started

Spoken defamation

LO 3.3.AEK 3.3.A.2