6m left·0%
Reading Time: 6 min
Last Updated: September 7, 2026
Main Ideas: 4
Reading Time: 6 min
Last Updated: September 7, 2026
Main Ideas: 4

Topic 3.9 Notes – Amendments: Due Process and the Right to Privacy

Verified for 2027 AP® U.S. Government & Politics Exam
Read aloud
Substantive due process is about liberty the government cannot unjustifiably take away, even if it passed the law correctly. In this topic, that idea connects to privacy, unenumerated rights, and Supreme Court cases that show how constitutional protection can expand, narrow, and shift over time.

What Substantive Due Process Protects

The due process clauses appear in two places:

  • Fifth Amendment limits the national government.
  • Fourteenth Amendment limits state and local governments. This is the one that matters most in privacy cases because those cases usually challenge state laws.

The word due process can mean two different things, and students mix them up all the time.

  • Procedural due process asks whether the government used fair steps, like notice, a hearing, and neutral decision-makers.
  • Substantive due process asks whether the government should be allowed to limit the liberty at all.

So a law can be enforced fairly and still be unconstitutional if it invades a protected liberty. That is the core idea here.

Study guide illustration

Due process overview

Courts usually ask:

  1. Is this claimed liberty a fundamental right?
  2. If yes, does the government have a strong enough reason to limit it?

If the right is fundamental, courts use heightened scrutiny. If it is not, the law usually survives rational basis review, which is very deferential to the government.

Under the Fourteenth Amendment, liberty has been read to include some deeply personal choices about family, marriage, contraception, and bodily autonomy.

Unenumerated Rights and the Right to Privacy

Some rights are written directly into the Constitution. Those are enumerated rights. Unenumerated rights are not listed word-for-word but may still be protected.

The Court has used a few main arguments for those rights:

  • First Amendment suggests a private sphere of belief and association.
  • Third Amendment protects the home from forced quartering.
  • Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches.
  • Fifth Amendment protects against self-incrimination.
  • Ninth Amendment says listing some rights does not deny others retained by the people.
  • Fourteenth Amendment liberty can include rights not specifically named.

In this topic, privacy means decisional privacy. It means freedom to make certain intimate personal or family choices without unjustified government interference.

That privacy is limited:

  • It does not protect every private action.
  • Government can still regulate for health, safety, children, and other legitimate interests.

One distinction matters a lot on tests:

  • Intimate decision-making privacy usually uses substantive due process.
  • Search-and-seizure privacy usually uses the Fourth Amendment.

The Main Cases on Privacy and Liberty

Pierce v. Society of Sisters 1925

Oregon tried to require almost all children to attend public school. The Court struck that down and recognized parental liberty to direct children’s upbringing and education. This is an early unenumerated-rights case under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Griswold v. Connecticut 1965

Connecticut banned contraceptives for married couples. The Court struck the law down and recognized marital privacy. The reasoning drew from Bill of Rights penumbras, the Ninth Amendment, and Fourteenth Amendment liberty.

Roe v. Wade 1973

The Court held that abortion was part of the privacy/liberty protected by substantive due process. It created the trimester framework, which limited how much states could regulate or ban abortion.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization 2022

The Court overruled Roe and held that the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion. The majority emphasized history and tradition when judging unenumerated rights and returned abortion policy mainly to state lawmakers.

Board of Education v. Earls 2002

The Court upheld random drug testing for students in extracurricular activities. This is a Fourth Amendment case, not substantive due process. That distinction is very testable.

These cases all reached the Supreme Court, which is why students often connect privacy and liberty debates with the Court itself.

Study guide illustration

U.S. Supreme Court building

Limits, Debates, and Why This Matters

The Hyde Amendment of 1976 barred certain federal funding for abortions, with exceptions such as rape, incest, or danger to the life of the pregnant woman. This shows a key difference between freedom from government interference and a right to government funding.

The debate over substantive due process never goes away:

  • Supporters say liberty must protect important rights that are not fully listed.
  • Critics say judges get too much power when they recognize unenumerated rights.

Keep these distinctions straight:

IdeaMeaning
Substantive due processWhether government may restrict a liberty at all
Procedural due processWhether government used fair methods
Selective incorporationApplying Bill of Rights protections to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment
Privacy rightsSpecific protected interests, not one unlimited general right

Key Takeaways

The Fourteenth Amendment is the main constitutional basis for privacy cases against state laws.
Substantive due process asks about the law’s substance, not whether the government used fair procedures.
Unenumerated rights are not written out explicitly, but the Court has still recognized some as constitutionally protected.
Griswold protected contraception, Roe protected abortion, and Dobbs removed federal constitutional protection for abortion.
Dobbs did not ban abortion nationwide. It returned the issue mainly to elected lawmakers in the states.
Earls is a privacy case under the Fourth Amendment, which is why “privacy” does not always mean substantive due process.
The Hyde Amendment shows that a constitutional liberty does not automatically create a right to government funding.

AP® is a trademark registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

Notes

1 credit used · 5/5 remaining