8m left·0%
Reading Time: 8 min
Last Updated: September 14, 2026
Main Ideas: 4
Reading Time: 8 min
Last Updated: September 14, 2026
Main Ideas: 4

Topic 8.6 Notes – Newly Independent States

Verified for 2027 AP® World History: Modern Exam
Read aloud
After World War II, empires fell apart fast, but independence did not produce neat, stable nation-states. This topic is about what came after decolonization: new borders, mass migration, competing nationalisms, and governments trying to build economies that still carried the marks of colonial rule.

How New States Emerged After Empire

Decolonization turned colonies into sovereign states. A state is a political unit with sovereignty over territory. A nation is a people with a shared identity. A nation-state is when those line up closely. In practice, most new states did not match one nation, because colonial borders had been drawn for imperial convenience.

Two things usually happened when empires withdrew:

  • Colonial borders stayed in place and became international borders. That happened in many places because redrawing everything risked even more conflict.
  • Partition split one colony into multiple states when rival nationalist claims could not be contained in one government.

Those borders mattered right away because they decided:

  • citizenship and who belonged
  • minority status and who might be vulnerable
  • land ownership and property rights
  • political representation and voting power
  • security and which army or police protected you

Nationalism changed too. Anti-colonial nationalism had united people against empire. After independence, the harder question was who the new state represented. Some leaders pushed territorial nationalism, meaning everyone inside the borders belonged. Others pushed ethnic, religious, or regional nationalism.

Cambodia

Cambodia shows that partition was not the only path. It gained independence from France in 1953 under Norodom Sihanouk. It emerged from French Indochina, the French colonial region that also included modern Vietnam and Laos.

Study guide illustration

French Indochina

The key point is simple: many new states were just former colonial units becoming sovereign countries.

Partition and Conflict

Partition often followed the same pattern. Empire ends, rival nationalist movements claim the same land, borders are drawn fast, and people move or are forced out.

Partition of India

In 1947, British India became India and Pakistan.

  • The Indian National Congress wanted one multi-religious state.
  • The Muslim League, led by Muhammad Ali Jinnah, argued Muslims needed a separate homeland.
  • The Radcliffe Line split Punjab and Bengal in a matter of weeks.
  • Pakistan had two wings, West Pakistan and East Pakistan. East Pakistan became Bangladesh in 1971.

The map below highlights the split between India, West Pakistan, and East Pakistan and the huge refugee movements that followed.

Study guide illustration

Partition of India, 1947

The human cost was enormous:

  • 10 to 15 million people crossed borders
  • about 1 million died
  • Hindus and Sikhs moved to India
  • Muslims moved to Pakistan

Kashmir stayed disputed and triggered war in 1947 to 1948. That is a favorite exam point. Partition did not solve nationalism. It often made it more intense.

Creation of Israel

The end of the British mandate in Palestine produced another major partition conflict.

  • Zionism sought a Jewish state.
  • Palestinian Arab nationalism sought Arab control of the same land.
  • The Holocaust increased support for a Jewish state.
  • The UN partition plan of 1947 proposed Jewish and Arab states, with Jerusalem internationalized.

Israel declared independence in 1948. Neighboring Arab states invaded. Israel survived and expanded beyond the UN plan.

Major results:

  • about 700,000 Palestinians fled or were expelled in the Nakba
  • Jordan controlled the West Bank and East Jerusalem
  • Egypt controlled Gaza
  • Israel resettled Jewish migrants, including Holocaust survivors and Jews leaving Middle Eastern and North African states

How New Governments Directed the Economy

Political independence did not erase colonial economic patterns. New states inherited commodity dependence, weak industry, port-focused infrastructure, and reliance on foreign capital and technology.

Governments often stepped in heavily:

PolicyWhat it meant
Five-Year PlansState set development goals
NationalizationGovernment took over banks, industries, or resources
Land reformBroke up large holdings to redistribute land
Import-substitution industrializationMade goods at home instead of importing them
Public investmentBuilt roads, dams, schools, and health systems

State planning did not automatically mean communism. Many new states used mixed economies.

  • Egypt under Nasser used land reform and planning, nationalized the Suez Canal in 1956, and tied sovereignty to development through the Aswan High Dam.
  • India under Indira Gandhi expanded planning, nationalized 14 major banks in 1969, and used Garibi Hatao rhetoric. The License Raj showed how regulation could also slow growth.
  • Tanzania under Julius Nyerere promoted ujamaa, self-reliance, villagization, and nationalization. Literacy improved, but growth stayed weak.
  • Sri Lanka under Sirimavo Bandaranaike expanded public control, land reform, welfare, and import restrictions. Social indicators improved, but shortages and export dependence remained.

Egypt is a good example of how development projects became symbols of national independence as well as economic planning.

Study guide illustration

Aswan High Dam and Lake Nasser, Egypt

What Independence Changed and What It Did Not

Independence gave governments control over development and resources. That was a huge change. The continuity was economic dependence on global markets, foreign loans, aid, and former colonial powers. That is where neocolonialism comes in, meaning indirect foreign influence through trade, debt, corporations, or aid.

Migration kept imperial ties alive:

  • South Asians in Britain moved into London, Birmingham, and Leicester because of postwar labor demand and the British Nationality Act of 1948.
  • Algerians in France settled in Paris, Marseille, and Lyon through labor migration and post-independence movement.
  • Filipinos in the United States migrated through English-language colonial education, military links, and expanded migration after 1965.

Key Takeaways

Most new states kept colonial borders, even when those borders ignored nations and identities.
Partition created states, but it also created refugees, minorities, and long-term border disputes.
India and Israel are paired on the AP exam because both connect decolonization to borders, displacement, and contested nationalism.
Nationalization means state ownership of the economy, and nationalism means political identity and claims to a state.
State-led development was common in new states, but it was often mixed-economy planning, not full communism.
Political independence came faster than economic independence.
Neocolonialism explains why formal empire could end while outside influence still shaped trade, debt, and development.

AP® is a trademark registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

Notes

1 credit used · 5/5 remaining